About - YUFO - E.T.s are Real

This website aims is to present the important and convincing evidence about the reality of UFOs and extraterrestrials visiting the Earth. Also important information that is being kept out of the lame-stream media.
The intention of YUFO is to only bring you the truth.

The videos on YUFO have a full screen button at the bottom right of each video. Don't forget to tell everyone about YUFO.
YUFO on Facebook


What's New

  PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NEXT  

The Electrolysis, Water, Hydrogen and Oxygen Myth

Les  16th Aug 2013 22:32:02

You can't get more energy out of burning HHO gas then you put into the electrolysis to break the molecular bonds of water?

The main part of the assumption of many people and scientists is that to break the bonds of the two parts hydrogen and the one part oxygen in water, the same or more energy is needed than you get from burning the HHO gas mixture that is produced by electrolysis.

"You can't get more energy out then you put in" they all scream. "It's against the laws of thermodinamics!".

This all stems from the original experiments done around 1832 showing how much energy was needed to release the gasses using a very inefficient version of electrolysis. From then on it was 'assumed' that the laws of thermodynamics applied.
The truth is that there is no transfer of energy when you break the molecular bonds. You are simply breaking the bonds.

The energy that is released by burning the Hydrogen and Oxygen mixture is governed by the amounts of the two gasses and not to by the way those gasses were manufactured.

That's why Hydrogen Peroxide doesn't need someone charging it with energy to make it explode. The energy is within the chemical mixture already.

By the way, don't get me wrong I believe in the laws of thermodynamics!

You don't need to tell me how unstable Hydrogen Peroxide is and that it needs to be stored in brown bottles because sunlight will cause it to destabilise. The very fact that H2O2 has that extra oxygen molecule should have given you a clue before you looked it up.

You'll find things like this from wikipedia showing electrolysis voltages used in a very inefficient experimental set-up.

Cathode (reduction): 2 H+(aq) + 2e → H2(g)    Eo
= 0.00 V

Anode (oxidation): 2 H2O(l) → O2(g) + 4 H+(aq) + 4e    Eo
= -1.23 V (Eo
= 1.23 ))

All it is showing is what is happening when you apply a DC voltage to the anode and cathode in water. It isn't showing a direct link between the electrical energy supplied and the energy inherent in hydrogen.
These are more or less the same figures from the first experiments in the 1830s. These are the results of an experiment nothing more.

You could think of it this way:
You have three balloons, two filled with Hydrogen and the other filled with Oxygen.
All three are connected with strings.
Cutting the strings with scissors takes a certain amount of energy.
(Let's say that cutting the strings also lets the gas out of the balloons.)
When you light a match, is it the same amount of energy released in the explosion as you used to cut the strings?
Of course not. It depends on how much gas was in the balloons.

If you think hydrogen has no energy until you supply it with some then I'll ask again where does the energy come from that makes H2O2 explode. And don't just tell me because it's unstable!

Watch the 'Stanley Meyer; It runs on water' video carefully and try to have an open mind you'll see he is not using that 1832 version of electrolysis he's using high frequency alternating current.
The next thing you should read about in wikipedia is the advantages high frequency AC has over DC.


Bombshell: UFO Case Files Revealed

Les  3rd Jun 2013 17:02:13

A presentation by Michael Schratt, aerospace historian, at MUFON's 2010 Symposium



Les  8th Feb 2013 13:34:23

A documentary looking at ancient stone ruins and stories of giants. Where did the giants come from? Were they just huge humans, another race of humans or aliens?


Science Set Free - Rupert Sheldrake

Les  7th Feb 2013 13:06:23

Biologist and author Dr. Rupert Sheldrake talks about scientific beliefs and dogmas.


UFOs: The Secret Evidence - EBE Award Winner

Les  3rd Dec 2012 16:55:10

The videos shown are quite old now but the information is excellent. (Don't be put off by the narrators accent.)



The Hidden History of the Human Race

Les  20th Nov 2012 20:08:27

Klaus Dona has travelled the world in search of unique and unexplained findings. Intrepid and unrelenting, he is on a mission to bring to the eye of the public such finds as giant bones, crystal skulls, carvings and sculptures in forms that do not fit into the contemporary view of our timeline.


Remote Viewing and Quantum Science

Les  3rd Jun 2013 09:44:14

The science gets a bit heavy in the middle but it's well worth watching.


Ice Age Animal Giants. Why Not Ice Age Human Giants?

Les  31st May 2013 20:07:14

Scientists accept that in the Ice Age there were giant Bears, giant Saber Tooth Tigers, giant Mamoths and Mastodons (elephants), giant Syrian Camels, giant Sloths, giant North American Lions, giant Beavers, giant Teratorns (birds), giant Irish Elk (deer). etc.

So why is it so difficult for them to accept, even after finding giant human skeletons, that there were giant humans during the Ice Age too.

I'm not sure if she is very tall or he is very small.


Psychic Parrot

Les  7th Feb 2013 14:42:26

This is a truly amazing parrot. This is not a trick or just a fluke. It was one of many scientifically controlled experiments with this parrot.


Stanton Friedman on UFOs, Science, SETI & Stephen Hawking

Les  15th Jan 2013 01:37:42

Here are some of the very important points that Nuclear Physicist Stanton Friedman explains in this lecture.

What he is saying is that scientists are not being scientific about the alien UFO subject. They dismiss the subject without giving it any scientific thought and often come out with some very stupid statements.

Scientists dismiss UFOs because they say there is no evidence. Although if they'd actually looked in to the subject they would find that there are many official studies that came to the conclusion that alien UFOs do exist based on undeniable evidence.

Scientists talk about the vast distances between stars and state that it is against the laws of physics to travel faster than light so ETs would not come here because of the thousands of years it would take. What the scientists always forget when they say such things is that it's against the laws of physics “as we presently understand them”. Also if they thought about our laws of physics just a little bit, travelling to the nearest stars wouldn't actually take thousands of years at all.

The official account of the history of the rise of human civilisation is only around 5000 years. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that other intelligent civilisations on other worlds could have had much longer histories. Think of all of the scientific developments that humans have made within the last 50 years. There will be civilisations in the universe that have had the same rate of development but instead of 5000 years, it could have been for millions of years. We can't even imagine the laws of physics they will have discovered.

Nuclear Fusion Engines
The biggest nuclear bomb was exploded by the Russians and it was the equivalent of 60 million tons of TNT.
In the second world war the largest conventional bombs were 10 tons of TNT.

Using a Nuclear Fusion (rocket) engine you can produce 10 million times more energy per particle than you get from a chemical rocket engine. You can also use the gravitational pull of planets, stars and black holes to give the spaceship a speed boost in the same way NASA used the Earth's gravity and the Moon's gravity to slingshot their Apollo spacecraft to and from the Moon in the late 60s and 70s.

g-force (gravitational-force)
1g = 9.8 metres per second squared.
1g = 21 miles per hour per second.
1g = 0 to 63 miles per hour in 3 seconds.

Speed of Light = 299,792,458 meters per second.
Speed of Light = 670,616,629 miles per hour.

It takes 1 year at 1g to get to the speed of light.

Einstein more or less said that as an object approaches the speed of light it's mass increases so much that the energy involved to travel at the speed of light would be too great.
He also said that due to time dilation the time elapsed for a passenger travelling at high speed would be less than the time elapsed for people (on Earth) observing.

So by travelling at 99.9% of light speed a trip to Zeta Reticuli (39 light years away) would only take 6 months for the passengers due to time dilation.
See: How_far_can_one_travel_from_the_Earth

By the way the closest star is Proxima Centauri at 4.2 light years away.
Alpha Centauri is 4.37 light years away.

Scientists never talk about these things because they start with the premiss of it being impossible anyway. They're not even using their own scientific principles when they dismiss interstellar travel.


  PREV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NEXT  

Please help YUFO to continue
the search for UFO evidence.


Many More on Amazon

Many More on Amazon

Rubber Guitar Strap Locks

Many More on Amazon

Many More on Amazon



Birmingham, West Midlands, England, UKVisits: 1163126